The crescent and star divide: Ankara’s golden child just ran away from home

2 hours ago 2

ARTICLE AD BOX

A quiet election on a divided island may mark the beginning of the end for Turkish dominance in the Eastern Mediterranean

While the world’s attention has been consumed by major global crises – and by US President Donald Trump’s bombshell statements – a quiet but consequential shift has taken place in the Eastern Mediterranean. It’s a story that has barely made international headlines, yet it may reshape the balance of power not only on this island, but across the region.

Last month, voters in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) – an unrecognized state under Ankara’s patronage – elected a new president. Tufan Erhurman, leader of the left-leaning Republican Turkish Party, scored a decisive victory with more than 62% of the vote, defeating former President Ersin Tatar, who had campaigned on a hardline pro-Turkish, “two-state” agenda. Turnout reached nearly 65%, a sign of strong political engagement among Turkish Cypriots.

Erhurman’s win marks more than just a change in leadership. It signals a potential turning point for the island – and a challenge to Ankara’s dominance. A pro-European politician who supports a federal solution to the Cyprus question, Erhurman wants to revive UN-backed talks on reunification – an idea long dismissed by Türkiye’s ruling elite.

Read more

Ankara’s uneasy celebration

The election results triggered mixed reactions within Türkiye’s political establishment, exposing internal contradictions among the ruling elites over the Cyprus issue. Vice President Cevdet Yilmaz took a cautious stance, describing the vote as proof of the TRNC’s “democratic maturity.” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also congratulated Erhurman. Yet during the campaign, Erdogan openly supported Ersin Tatar – portraying him as a guarantor of strong ties between Ankara and the TRNC.

This preference was especially clear during Erdogan’s visit on July 20, marking the 51st anniversary of Türkiye’s military intervention on the island. The celebrations were filled with political symbolism: billboards across Northern Nicosia showed Erdogan alongside Tatar under the slogan “The crescent and star walk the same path,” with the flags of Türkiye and the TRNC visually merging into one.

Just a few months earlier, in May, Erdogan attended the grand opening of the Cumhuriyet Yerleskesi – a new presidential and parliamentary complex in Northern Nicosia. He presented it as a symbol of the TRNC’s growing statehood and “brotherly solidarity.” Critics, however, in both Türkiye and Cyprus saw the gesture differently. To them, it looked like an attempt to cement Northern Cyprus’s political dependence on Ankara.

Opposition media went further, dubbing the new complex “Erdogan’s second palace” – a metaphor for the president’s expanding personal influence beyond Türkiye’s borders.

A diplomatic reach that meets its limits

Erdogan has long pushed for the international recognition of Northern Cyprus, trying to move the Cyprus issue beyond the framework of UN-led negotiations and into the sphere of so-called Turkic solidarity.

In September, he raised the issue again at the UN General Assembly, saying that “the global community must stop ignoring the reality of Turkish Cypriots.” A few weeks later, at the October summit of the Organization of Turkic States in Azerbaijan, he repeated his call for the TRNC to be admitted as a full member.

Read more

Yet even Türkiye’s closest allies – Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan – refused to back the initiative. The geopolitical risks of alienating the EU and the UN were too high. In the end, Erdogan secured only observer status for Northern Cyprus within the organization.

This outcome marked a clear limit to Ankara’s diplomatic reach. Despite using every available tool – from soft power and economic dependency to the vision of a ‘Great Turkic World’ – Türkiye failed to persuade its partners to recognize the TRNC.

The nationalists push back

Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Movement Party and a long-time ally of President Erdogan, reacted sharply to the election results. Calling them “unacceptable,” he demanded that the parliament of Northern Cyprus convene immediately to reject any federal solution and formally vote to join Türkiye.

Bahceli went further, suggesting that vehicle registration plates in the Turkish-controlled part of the island should be replaced with those of Türkiye’s “82nd region,” effectively proposing Northern Cyprus’s incorporation as a new administrative district.

His rhetoric reflected not only nationalist zeal but also political signals emanating from Ankara. Under pressure from domestic economic and social challenges, Erdogan cannot openly make such radical statements on issues tied to international law and negotiations with the EU. Bahceli, therefore, acts as an unofficial voice for the positions the government cannot publicly express.

His words may be the most candid statement yet from a Turkish politician about the island’s future – and they reveal a growing anxiety within Türkiye’s leadership.

A turning point for both sides of the island

Erhurman responded firmly to Bahceli’s remarks, calling them disrespectful to the right of Turkish Cypriots to self-determination. He noted that Northern Cyprus consults with Türkiye on foreign policy matters but “has never been part of Turkish territory.”

He emphasized that the key goal is to preserve democratic maturity and avoid rhetoric that undermines trust and mutual respect between peoples. For Erhurman, rigid insistence on isolation has brought nothing but economic and social hardship to the Turkish Cypriot community.

Read more

He reiterated his willingness to resume UN-led negotiations aimed at the reunification of the island within a federal framework governed by a single administration. This, he said, remains “the only path to lasting peace and integration into Europe.”

Nikos Christodoulides, president of the Republic of Cyprus, welcomed Erhurman’s electoral victory and expressed hope for an early meeting. He confirmed his readiness for substantive dialogue on the Cyprus issue, noting that the new political landscape “creates a window of opportunity for rebuilding trust and overcoming years of division.”

For the Greek Cypriot leadership, Erhurman’s win is seen as a chance to revive long-stalled UN negotiations on reunification. While deep mistrust remains, Nicosia views the new administration in the north as a potential partner capable of breaking the deadlock.

Ankara’s strategic anxiety

Ankara’s reaction to the election results goes beyond politics. For Türkiye’s leadership, the outcome represents not just a domestic setback, but a potential threat to its strategic position in the Eastern Mediterranean.

If the new administration in Northern Cyprus resumes negotiations and moves toward reunification, Ankara fears that the process could unfold under Greek and EU influence. In that scenario, Northern Cyprus might gradually drift out of Türkiye’s orbit, aligning instead with Athens and Brussels. Turkish analysts warn that such a shift would weaken the country’s geopolitical architecture – one built on maintaining control over key points in the Eastern Mediterranean and northern Syria.

For decades, Northern Cyprus has served as a crucial extension of Türkiye’s regional strategy – both as a political ally and as a forward base securing Ankara’s access to energy routes, maritime zones, and surveillance operations. The idea of losing that foothold, even symbolically, raises serious concerns within the Turkish establishment.

Devlet Bahceli warned that the elections in Northern Cyprus could have far-reaching consequences for the wider region. If Turkish Cypriots succeed in pursuing federalization and secure institutional guarantees within a unified Cyprus, he argued, similar demands might emerge among other ethnic and religious groups across the Middle East – particularly among the Kurds and Druze in Syria.

Read more

From a nationalist perspective, such a development would set a dangerous precedent. It could encourage autonomy movements near Türkiye’s borders and challenge the territorial integrity of neighboring states – including Türkiye itself.

For Ankara’s hardliners, a federal Cyprus looks like a strategic trap – one that could erode the very foundations of Türkiye’s influence in the region.

An economy bound to Ankara

Northern Cyprus remains an area of Türkiye’s dominant influence. Key infrastructure projects – from transportation networks and water supply systems to energy grids and telecommunications – are built and managed by Turkish companies operating with state support.

Most funding for construction, energy imports, and public administration comes directly from Türkiye’s budget. This financial lifeline effectively turns the TRNC into an economically dependent subsystem integrated into Türkiye’s broader economic framework.

For Ankara, this dependence is a strategic instrument. Economic control allows Türkiye to maintain a direct presence in one of the most sensitive parts of the Mediterranean, securing both political leverage and long-term influence.

The island’s position adds another layer of importance. Its proximity to the Suez route and the Syrian coast makes control over Northern Cyprus central to Türkiye’s defense and intelligence strategy. The Gecitkale Airbase hosts Turkish aircraft and drones that monitor maritime and military activity across the Eastern Mediterranean – a reminder that for Ankara, the island is as much a geopolitical outpost as it is a political statement.

The case for the status quo

Former President Ersin Tatar repeatedly emphasized this strategic logic during his campaign. He warned that adopting a federal model, as proposed by Erhurman, would inevitably lead to the withdrawal of Turkish troops from the island and the loss of Türkiye’s most important foothold in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Tatar argued that preserving the current status quo is essential to Türkiye’s national security. In his view, Northern Cyprus is a linchpin in Ankara’s wider defense and foreign policy – a front line in the ongoing contest over maritime borders, energy routes, and regional power balance.

Read more

Participants of a meeting of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Council of Heads of State at the Palace of the Nation in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.

He described Northern Cyprus as a “strategic shield” that protects Türkiye’s southern flank, insisting that any shift toward reunification would weaken this defense and embolden Türkiye’s rivals. For him and his supporters, maintaining the division of the island is not an obstacle to peace but a necessary condition for stability.

Missteps and miscalculations

Bulent Arinc, co-founder of Türkiye’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK), harshly criticized the campaign and the strategic mistakes that led to Tatar’s defeat. According to Arinc, Turkish political circles that openly backed Tatar displayed “flawed and clumsy” tactics.

He pointed to the campaign’s weak organization and the use of questionable public figures and celebrities, which only damaged Tatar’s credibility. Fake polls suggesting his inevitable victory, Arinc said, created a false sense of security and prevented the team from adjusting its strategy in time.

He also highlighted a cultural disconnect that alienated many voters. The campaign relied on nationalist symbols and folk songs from Türkiye’s Black Sea region – motifs that felt foreign to Turkish Cypriots, who generally hold more moderate and pro-European views.

For Arinc, the election served as proof that mechanically exporting Ankara’s political playbook to Northern Cyprus no longer works. What once guaranteed influence now exposes its limits.

The waning reach of Ankara

The elections in Northern Cyprus are more than a local political story; they signal a broader shift in the region’s balance of power. Erhurman’s victory reflects not only changing attitudes within the Turkish Cypriot community but also deeper political undercurrents inside Türkiye itself.

The ruling Justice and Development Party’s confrontational approach toward domestic opposition has shaped its dealings abroad – and the loss of a loyal ally in the TRNC mirrors the growing limits of that strategy. Erhurman, who leads the Republican Turkish Party, is ideologically close to Türkiye’s main opposition, the Republican People’s Party (CHP). His win is therefore symbolically and politically sensitive for Ankara.

Amid rising economic pressures and an increasingly divided electorate at home, the outcome in Northern Cyprus signals more than a diplomatic setback. It reveals the erosion of Erdogan’s ability to control even those political structures most reliant on Türkiye.

If Erhurman follows through on his campaign promises – seeking a federal solution to the Cyprus issue, strengthening ties with the European Union, and asserting greater political autonomy from Ankara – Türkiye could face a genuine geopolitical loss. Northern Cyprus, long seen as a loyal outpost, may begin to slip from Ankara’s grasp.

For Erdogan, who has built his image on restoring Türkiye’s global stature, losing political control over the TRNC would be more than a regional disappointment. It would be a symbolic blow – proof that the era of Ankara’s uncontested influence in the Eastern Mediterranean is coming to an end.

Read Entire Article